Download Rhetorical Figures in Science by Jeanne Fahnestock PDF

By Jeanne Fahnestock

Rhetorical Figures in Science breaks new flooring within the rhetorical examine of medical argument because the first e-book to illustrate how figures of speech except metaphor were used to complete key conceptual strikes in medical texts. Examples, either verbal and visible, diversity throughout disciplines and centuries to reaffirm the optimistic price of those as soon as widely-taught devices.

Show description

Read or Download Rhetorical Figures in Science PDF

Best rhetoric books

Sophistical Rhetoric in Classical Greece (Studies in Rhetoric/Communication)

In Sophistical Rhetoric in Classical Greece, John Poulakos bargains a brand new conceptualization of sophistry, explaining its course and form in addition to the explanations why Plato, Isocrates, and Aristotle came across it objectionable. Poulakos argues right figuring out of sophistical rhetoric calls for a snatch of 3 cultural dynamics of the 5th century B. C. : the good judgment of conditions, the ethic of festival, and the classy of exhibition. Traced to such phenomena as daily practices, athletic contests, and dramatic performances, those dynamics set the degree for the position of sophistical rhetoric in Hellenic tradition and clarify why sophistry has commonly been understood as inconsistent, agonistic, and ostentatious.

In his dialogue of historic responses to sophistical rhetoric, Poulakos observes that Plato, Isocrates, and Aristotle came upon sophistry morally reprehensible, politically lifeless, and theoretically incoherent. whilst, they produced their very own model of rhetoric that endorsed moral integrity, political unification, and theoretical coherence. Poulakos explains that those responses and substitute types have been stimulated via a look for suggestions to such old difficulties as ethical uncertainty, political instability, and social disease. Poulakos concludes that sophistical rhetoric used to be as helpful in its day as its Platonic, Isocratean, and Aristotelian opposite numbers have been in theirs.

At War with Metaphor: Media Propaganda and Racism in the War on Terror

At warfare with Metaphor deals a compelling research of our public discussions of the struggle on terror and the binding conceptual metaphors wherein they're framed. analyzing the photographs of animal, insect, and ailment that form and restrict our figuring out of the battle, and tying those pictures to ancient and modern makes use of of propaganda and media filters, the authors discover how information media, together with political cartoons and speak radio, are enmeshed during this harmful, dehumanizing language.

Heidegger and Rhetoric

That includes essays by way of popular students Michael J. Hyde, Theodore Kisiel, Mark Michalski, Otto Pöggeler, and Nancy S. Struever, this ebook presents the definitive remedy of Martin Heidegger’s 1924 lecture direction, “Basic options of Aristotelian Philosophy. ” A deep and unique interview with thinker Hans-Georg Gadamer, who attended the lecture path, is usually incorporated.

How to Write Anything: A Guide and Reference with Readings with 2009 MLA and 2010 APA Updates

Click on right here to determine concerning the 2009 MLA Updates and the 2010 APA Updates. Designed to be transparent and easy, tips to Write whatever re-imagines how texts paintings, with aid for college students anyplace they're of their writing procedure. The consultant, in components 1 and a pair of, lays out concentrated suggestion for writing universal genres, whereas the Reference, in components three via nine, covers the diversity of writing and study talents that scholars desire as they paintings throughout genres and disciplines.

Additional info for Rhetorical Figures in Science

Example text

Of these two modes of explanation (formal and functional), the latter, the anatomy of speech acts, was particularly liable to expansion. How long could a list be that included every possible degree of threat or apology or exhortation or promise or admonition or flattery or insult or rebuke or supplication that a speaker might want to communicate? , making a statement in the form of asking a question). Unlike most figures of thought, those schemes that do have a precise profile, that can be both formally identified and functionally analyzed, are a much smaller core group, persisting across the centuries despite their placement in different categories.

Nor is it really possible to factor out the emotional content from the argumentative content. Though there is a long tradition of distinguishing appeals to the reason from appeals to the emotions, the two halves that would be separated out in this analysis would not add up to the whole expressed by the aposiopesis, since inexpressibility is both an emotional and material point. Nuanced complexes of attitude plus material together constitute an argument and cannot really be untwined. Value-added theories of the figures have, then, been seriously misleading, especially when the value presumably added is a dissociable emotional dimension, and they have mistakenly reinforced a great division in language between two domains.

Yet these arguments share a family resemblance by virtue of the fact that they can all be succinctly expressed by an antimetabole. This type of argument by reversal was identified in the rhetorical tradition almost 2500 years ago as was the durable verbal device called the antimetabole that epitomizes it, an argumentative scheme that persists across centuries and situations. There is a long tradition, especially powerful in the text-based side of rhetorical studies, of emphasis on such formal techniques and on the argumentative strategies they can express.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.83 of 5 – based on 35 votes