By Barbara Dancygier
This full of life creation to figurative language explains a huge variety of strategies, together with metaphor, metonymy, simile, and mixing, and develops new instruments for examining them. It coherently grounds the linguistic knowing of those strategies in easy cognitive mechanisms equivalent to categorization, frames, psychological areas, and point of view; and it suits them right into a constant framework that's utilized to cross-linguistic info and in addition to figurative buildings in gesture and the visible arts. complete and functional, the e-book comprises analyses of figurative makes use of of either be aware meanings and linguistic buildings. • offers definitions of significant strategies • deals in-depth analyses of examples, exploring a number of degrees of complexity • Surveys figurative buildings in numerous discourse genres • is helping scholars to attach figurative utilization with the conceptual underpinnings of language • is going past English to discover cross-linguistic and cross-modal information
Read or Download Figurative Language PDF
Best rhetoric books
Sophistical Rhetoric in Classical Greece (Studies in Rhetoric/Communication)
In Sophistical Rhetoric in Classical Greece, John Poulakos deals a brand new conceptualization of sophistry, explaining its path and form in addition to the explanations why Plato, Isocrates, and Aristotle discovered it objectionable. Poulakos argues right figuring out of sophistical rhetoric calls for a snatch of 3 cultural dynamics of the 5th century B. C. : the good judgment of situations, the ethic of pageant, and the classy of exhibition. Traced to such phenomena as daily practices, athletic contests, and dramatic performances, those dynamics set the degree for the function of sophistical rhetoric in Hellenic tradition and clarify why sophistry has ordinarily been understood as inconsistent, agonistic, and ostentatious.
In his dialogue of old responses to sophistical rhetoric, Poulakos observes that Plato, Isocrates, and Aristotle discovered sophistry morally reprehensible, politically lifeless, and theoretically incoherent. whilst, they produced their very own model of rhetoric that recommended moral integrity, political unification, and theoretical coherence. Poulakos explains that those responses and substitute types have been inspired through a look for ideas to such old difficulties as ethical uncertainty, political instability, and social affliction. Poulakos concludes that sophistical rhetoric used to be as worthwhile in its day as its Platonic, Isocratean, and Aristotelian opposite numbers have been in theirs.
At War with Metaphor: Media Propaganda and Racism in the War on Terror
At conflict with Metaphor deals a compelling research of our public discussions of the warfare on terror and the binding conceptual metaphors during which they're framed. interpreting the pictures of animal, insect, and illness that form and restrict our realizing of the struggle, and tying those photographs to historic and modern makes use of of propaganda and media filters, the authors discover how information media, together with political cartoons and speak radio, are enmeshed during this destructive, dehumanizing language.
That includes essays by way of popular students Michael J. Hyde, Theodore Kisiel, Mark Michalski, Otto Pöggeler, and Nancy S. Struever, this publication presents the definitive remedy of Martin Heidegger’s 1924 lecture path, “Basic options of Aristotelian Philosophy. ” A deep and unique interview with thinker Hans-Georg Gadamer, who attended the lecture direction, can also be incorporated.
How to Write Anything: A Guide and Reference with Readings with 2009 MLA and 2010 APA Updates
Click on right here to determine concerning the 2009 MLA Updates and the 2010 APA Updates. Designed to be transparent and straightforward, tips on how to Write whatever re-imagines how texts paintings, with aid for college students anyplace they're of their writing procedure. The advisor, in components 1 and a pair of, lays out targeted recommendation for writing universal genres, whereas the Reference, in components three via nine, covers the diversity of writing and examine talents that scholars desire as they paintings throughout genres and disciplines.
- Writer's Block and How to Use it
- Writing Theology Well: A Rhetoric for Theological and Biblical Writers
- Rhetoric at the Boundaries: The Art and Theology of New Testament Chain-Link Transitions
- Rhetoric on the Margins of Modernity: Vico, Condillac, Monboddo (Rhetorical Philosophy & Theory)
Additional resources for Figurative Language
Sample text
Would it be natural to talk about nuclear war as a model of a debate? Would we refer to the military hierarchy (say, foot soldiers vs. generals) in portraying an oppositional verbal exchange? Certainly, the choice of an expression like He viciously attacked my views seems more natural than an expression like I sent my troops on a suicide mission when talking about a debate. The latter expression, however, is not entirely impossible in a context where the war metaphor has already been elaborated, creating some expectation that further aspects of the domain could be applicable.
In fact, some analysts find it more appropriate to label the mapping argument is The concept of a mapping combat. This question does not imply that metaphoric mappings in themselves lack specificity, but rather that our formulation of them necessarily depends on the linguistic labels we find most appropriate to represent the conceptual content involved. It is therefore all the more important to realize that terms such as War or Combat are primarily representations of frames – knowledge structures we use in processing language.
Conceptual structure can be more or less richly detailed, or specified. e. not detailed – conceptual structure that is shared between the argument is war and the communication is object exchange metaphors: the schematically shared target-domain structure is that of (not necessarily argumentative) communication, and the schematically shared source-domain structure is that of objects being moved from one participant to another (not necessarily either containers or projectiles). The choice of which label to use to represent a metaphoric domain thus needs to take many aspects of the mapping into account.