Download Behemoth Teaches Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes on Political by Geoffrey M. Vaughan PDF

By Geoffrey M. Vaughan

Did Hobbes's political philosophy have useful intentions? There exists no _Hobbist_ tuition of notion; no new political order used to be encouraged via Hobbesian precepts. but in Behemoth Teaches Leviathan Geoffrey M. Vaughan revisits Behemoth to bare hitherto unexplored pedagogic function to Hobbes's political philosophy.

Show description

Read Online or Download Behemoth Teaches Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes on Political Education (Applications of Political Theory) PDF

Best history & theory books

Hegel's Theory of the Modern State

This examine in English of Hegel's political philosophy offers an total view of the improvement of Hegel's political pondering. the writer has drawn on Hegel's philosophical works, his political tracts and his own correspondence. Professor Avineri indicates that even if Hegel is basically regarded as a thinker of the nation, he was once a lot curious about social difficulties and his thought of the country needs to be understood during this context.

Social Movements and Organization Theory

Even if the fields of association conception and social circulation concept have lengthy been seen as belonging to assorted worlds, contemporary occasions have intervened, reminding us that enterprises have gotten extra movement-like and risky and politicized whereas hobbies usually tend to borrow ideas from companies.

The Political Theory of Recognition: A Critical Introduction

Lately the political panorama has replaced: confirmed rules approximately category, economic climate, state and equality were challenged by means of a brand new politics of identification, tradition, ethnicity and distinction. The political thought of popularity is a reaction to those demanding situations. during this, the 1st introductory e-book at the topic, Simon Thompson analyses the argument simply society is one who indicates all its individuals due attractiveness.

International Relations Theories

Drawing on a wealth of workmanship from a world crew of participants, the 3rd variation of diplomacy Theories presents an up to date and complete account of all of the significant IR theories--including many of the extra replacement understandings now not present in different texts--and helps them with case learn examples.

Additional info for Behemoth Teaches Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes on Political Education (Applications of Political Theory)

Sample text

26 Making the Political and about those who continued to think within its categories, was its conflation of ethical virtue with the capacity to effect political good – a logical fallacy that he explicitly blames on Confucianism (ZQJ 181). Moral goodness does not always result in political efficacy, Zhang realizes, and being “selfless” in the way many contemporary political leaders recommended often resulted in sacrificing oneself not for the greater good but for the power plays of political elites.

For example, Zhang explicitly defended British parliamentarism against the American-style presidential system promoted by Sun Yat-sen (ZQJ 104–127). The paradigmatic examples here are Rawls, Political Liberalism, and Pettit, Republicanism. Making the political 23 here. Zhang’s more salient concern is promoting citizen involvement in polity-building, given the absence of even minimal consensus, stable political signs, and social cohesion in the nascent Chinese Republic. These are primarily problems of founding, and they implicate him more closely in democratic discourses about the nature and sites of political action than in liberal or republican discourses about the promotion of liberty.

He saw his own work as an important corrective to particular Confucian tenets embodied in the institutional apparatus of the late empire, particularly those which in his view conflated loyalty to the emperor with loyalty to the Chinese political community as a whole, and those that effectively invalidated both the agency and the contributions of the common people. 36 Zhang does so by emphasizing the legitimacy of an enlightened selfinterest, developing concepts such as “talent” and “self-awareness” that bear strong resemblances to late imperial critiques of the “public good” made by Huang Zongxi (1610–1695), Gu Yanwu (1613–1682), Dai Zhen (1724–1777), and others.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.03 of 5 – based on 47 votes