By Christiane Donahue, Kelly Blewett, Michael Mastanduno, Joesph Harris
On the 1966 Dartmouth Seminar, students accrued to discuss the course of English stories within the academy. This debate had far-reaching results and arguably perpetually replaced writing guideline within the usa. To commemorate the forty fifth anniversary of this collecting, Dartmouth collage hosted an occasion either celebrating the previous and searching towards the long run. Then as now, there's this easy fact: writing good concerns, and it concerns in associations of upper schooling throughout disciplines. but what it ability to be a great author within the academy and within the public sphere continues to be a domain of controversy and dialogue.
The energy of Writing: Dartmouth ’66 within the Twenty-First Century argues that any dialogue of why writing good issues should still expand past composition and rhetoric students to catch the data that impressive academics and writers themselves placed to paintings on a daily basis. The editors have introduced jointly students and public intellectuals (including ny instances best-selling authors David McCullough and Steve Strogatz) from the sciences, social sciences, humanities, and interdisciplinary fields to have interaction in a discussion approximately a number of the debatable questions relating to writing this day. Readers will interact with questions on what it potential to write down good and the way varied solutions impact the instructing and studying of writing in larger schooling. every one anchor article—representing disciplines as diverse as musicology, African stories, arithmetic, and history—receives responses from Dartmouth school and nationally well known college individuals in writing experiences courses.
This well timed and wide-ranging assortment may have attraction a long way past writing teachers and is in particular designed for readers throughout disciplines.
Hardcover is un-jacketed.
Read Online or Download The Power of Writing: Dartmouth ’66 in the Twenty-First Century PDF
Best rhetoric books
Sophistical Rhetoric in Classical Greece (Studies in Rhetoric/Communication)
In Sophistical Rhetoric in Classical Greece, John Poulakos bargains a brand new conceptualization of sophistry, explaining its course and form in addition to the explanations why Plato, Isocrates, and Aristotle discovered it objectionable. Poulakos argues right realizing of sophistical rhetoric calls for a grab of 3 cultural dynamics of the 5th century B. C. : the good judgment of situations, the ethic of festival, and the classy of exhibition. Traced to such phenomena as daily practices, athletic contests, and dramatic performances, those dynamics set the level for the function of sophistical rhetoric in Hellenic tradition and clarify why sophistry has characteristically been understood as inconsistent, agonistic, and ostentatious.
In his dialogue of historical responses to sophistical rhetoric, Poulakos observes that Plato, Isocrates, and Aristotle came across sophistry morally reprehensible, politically lifeless, and theoretically incoherent. whilst, they produced their very own model of rhetoric that endorsed moral integrity, political unification, and theoretical coherence. Poulakos explains that those responses and replacement types have been influenced by means of a look for suggestions to such historic difficulties as ethical uncertainty, political instability, and social illness. Poulakos concludes that sophistical rhetoric was once as worthwhile in its day as its Platonic, Isocratean, and Aristotelian opposite numbers have been in theirs.
At War with Metaphor: Media Propaganda and Racism in the War on Terror
At conflict with Metaphor bargains a compelling research of our public discussions of the warfare on terror and the binding conceptual metaphors by which they're framed. analyzing the pictures of animal, insect, and illness that form and restrict our knowing of the warfare, and tying those pictures to old and modern makes use of of propaganda and media filters, the authors discover how information media, together with political cartoons and speak radio, are enmeshed during this harmful, dehumanizing language.
That includes essays through popular students Michael J. Hyde, Theodore Kisiel, Mark Michalski, Otto Pöggeler, and Nancy S. Struever, this booklet offers the definitive therapy of Martin Heidegger’s 1924 lecture path, “Basic thoughts of Aristotelian Philosophy. ” A deep and unique interview with thinker Hans-Georg Gadamer, who attended the lecture path, is additionally integrated.
How to Write Anything: A Guide and Reference with Readings with 2009 MLA and 2010 APA Updates
Click on right here to determine concerning the 2009 MLA Updates and the 2010 APA Updates. Designed to be transparent and easy, easy methods to Write something re-imagines how texts paintings, with help for college kids anyplace they're of their writing strategy. The advisor, in elements 1 and a pair of, lays out centred suggestion for writing universal genres, whereas the Reference, in elements three via nine, covers the variety of writing and study abilities that scholars desire as they paintings throughout genres and disciplines.
- On Human Nature: A Gathering While Everything Flows, 1967-1984
- Silence and Listening as Rhetorical Arts
- A Rhetoric of Irony
- Contagious metaphor
- The influence of the Great Chain of Being on the rhetoric manuals of sixteenth century Tudor England
Extra info for The Power of Writing: Dartmouth ’66 in the Twenty-First Century
Sample text
Stephen Jay Gould In contrast to Feynman, Gould is the master of connections. Whereas Feynman lives and breathes for physics and physics alone, Gould links his subject — evolution — to the rest of existence in glorious detail. His essays range over science; history; philosophy; politics; architecture; and all parts of culture, high and low. 400 hitters in baseball and why Mickey Mouse’s facial features became progressively less ratlike and more adorably infantile (big eyes, big 13 14 Sciences head, rounded features) during his first fifty years.
After all, such writing 33 34 Sciences is intended to communicate new information to its readers, but accomplishing this necessarily means meeting them on their own terms (by providing simple examples in common language and using familiar analogies) and not overwhelming readers with too much information. I’d like to close with a few remarks that are particular to writing for the public about my own field, mathematics. The communication of mathematics has some very special challenges, largely related to the fact that although in other sciences (and we’ll neglect for the moment the question of whether or not mathematics should be lumped in with the sciences) the subjects of interest are embodied in tangible entities (for example, brains, stars, atoms, frogs, cells, and people), mathematics often concerns itself with Platonic products of pure thought — numbers, geometries, topologies, and the like, most of which are expressed in an extraordinary shorthand of symbolic notation.
Not quite what I was shooting for, but hey, it’s a start. , Robert B. Leighton, and Matthew Sands. 1964. The Feynman Lectures on Physics. 3 vols. Boston: Addison-Wesley. Gould, Stephen Jay. 1980. The Panda’s Thumb: More Reflections in Natural History. New York: W. W. Norton. Strogatz, Steven. 2010. ” New York Times. html. (The individual columns appeared in slightly modified form in Steven Strogatz, 2012, The Joy of x: A Guided Tour of Math, from One to Infinity [London: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt]).