By Shawn J. Parry-Giles, Visit Amazon's J. Michael Hogan Page, search results, Learn about Author Central, J. Michael Hogan,
The guide of Rhetoric and Public Address is a state of the art significant other to the sector that showcases either the ancient traditions and the longer term percentages for public handle scholarship within the twenty-first century.
- Focuses on public deal with as either a subject and a severe point of view
- Mindful of the connections among the research of public handle and the historical past of rules
- Provides an old review of public handle examine and pedagogy, in addition to a reassessment of up to date public deal with scholarship via these such a lot engaged in its perform
- Includes in-depth discussions of uncomplicated matters and controversies public deal with scholarship
- Explores the connection among the learn of public deal with and modern problems with civic engagement and democratic citizenship
- Reflects the variety of perspectives between public handle students, advancing on-going discussions and debates over the pursuits and personality of rhetorical scholarship
Content:
Chapter 1 The background of Public deal with as a tutorial learn (pages 17–66): Martin J. Medhurst
Chapter 2 Public handle Scholarship within the New Century (pages 67–85): David Zarefsky
Chapter three Rhetorical feedback 2009 (pages 86–107): Karlyn Kohrs Campbell
Chapter four Textual restoration, Textual Discovery (pages 109–132): Davis W. Houck
Chapter five The procedures and demanding situations of Textual Authentication (pages 133–156): Robert N. Gaines
Chapter 6 Archival learn and the yank Presidency (pages 157–183): Shawn J. Parry?Giles
Chapter 7 From getting better Women's phrases to Documenting Gender Constructs (pages 184–202): Susan Zaeske and Sarah Jedd
Chapter eight The Racial Contexts of Public tackle (pages 203–228): Kirt H. Wilson
Chapter nine Lilies and bog Paper (pages 229–249): Cheryl R. Jorgensen?Earp
Chapter 10 learning visible Modes of Public tackle (pages 250–270): Cara A. Finnegan
Chapter eleven concept and Public deal with (pages 271–290): John M. Murphy
Chapter 12 Jimmy Carter, Human Rights, and Instrumental results of Presidential Rhetoric (pages 291–312): Mary E. Stuckey
Chapter thirteen examining Constitutive Rhetorics (pages 313–341): James Jasinski and Jennifer R. Mercieca
Chapter 14 Feminism and Public deal with examine (pages 343–372): Bonnie J. Dow
Chapter 15 the matter of Race in Public handle learn (pages 373–397): Eric King Watts
Chapter sixteen Sexuality and Public deal with (pages 398–421): Charles E. Morris
Chapter 17 Public tackle and the Revival of yank Civic tradition (pages 422–447): J. Michael Hogan
Read Online or Download The Handbook of Rhetoric and Public Address PDF
Best rhetoric books
Sophistical Rhetoric in Classical Greece (Studies in Rhetoric/Communication)
In Sophistical Rhetoric in Classical Greece, John Poulakos bargains a brand new conceptualization of sophistry, explaining its path and form in addition to the explanations why Plato, Isocrates, and Aristotle chanced on it objectionable. Poulakos argues right figuring out of sophistical rhetoric calls for a grab of 3 cultural dynamics of the 5th century B. C. : the good judgment of situations, the ethic of pageant, and the cultured of exhibition. Traced to such phenomena as daily practices, athletic contests, and dramatic performances, those dynamics set the level for the position of sophistical rhetoric in Hellenic tradition and clarify why sophistry has regularly been understood as inconsistent, agonistic, and ostentatious.
In his dialogue of old responses to sophistical rhetoric, Poulakos observes that Plato, Isocrates, and Aristotle stumbled on sophistry morally reprehensible, politically lifeless, and theoretically incoherent. even as, they produced their very own model of rhetoric that endorsed moral integrity, political unification, and theoretical coherence. Poulakos explains that those responses and replacement models have been influenced by way of a look for options to such historic difficulties as ethical uncertainty, political instability, and social ailment. Poulakos concludes that sophistical rhetoric was once as priceless in its day as its Platonic, Isocratean, and Aristotelian opposite numbers have been in theirs.
At War with Metaphor: Media Propaganda and Racism in the War on Terror
At warfare with Metaphor bargains a compelling research of our public discussions of the conflict on terror and the binding conceptual metaphors wherein they're framed. interpreting the photographs of animal, insect, and sickness that form and restrict our knowing of the warfare, and tying those photos to historic and modern makes use of of propaganda and media filters, the authors discover how information media, together with political cartoons and speak radio, are enmeshed during this destructive, dehumanizing language.
That includes essays through well known students Michael J. Hyde, Theodore Kisiel, Mark Michalski, Otto Pöggeler, and Nancy S. Struever, this ebook presents the definitive remedy of Martin Heidegger’s 1924 lecture direction, “Basic recommendations of Aristotelian Philosophy. ” A deep and unique interview with thinker Hans-Georg Gadamer, who attended the lecture path, can be incorporated.
How to Write Anything: A Guide and Reference with Readings with 2009 MLA and 2010 APA Updates
Click on right here to determine in regards to the 2009 MLA Updates and the 2010 APA Updates. Designed to be transparent and straightforward, tips on how to Write something re-imagines how texts paintings, with help for college students anyplace they're of their writing approach. The advisor, in elements 1 and a couple of, lays out centred suggestion for writing universal genres, whereas the Reference, in components three via nine, covers the variety of writing and examine abilities that scholars want as they paintings throughout genres and disciplines.
- Le Fanu's gothic: the rhetoric of darkness
- Composition and Cornel West: Notes toward a Deep Democracy
- Interpreting a Classic: Demosthenes and His Ancient Commentators
- A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms
- The Speaking Self: Language Lore and English Usage
Additional info for The Handbook of Rhetoric and Public Address
Sample text
30 Fulton may, in fact, have been the first person in the field to use the term “rhetorical criticism,” a locution that surfaced occasionally over the first 50 years of the association, but which did not come into widespread usage until the 1960s. The story of the period between 1899 (when Winans went to Cornell) and 1914 (when the national association was founded) is a narrative with multiple plots – the rise of the English department as the custodian of Oral English, the reduction of rhetorical instruction to matters of grammar and composition, the widespread influence of the elocutionary movement, the beginnings of intercollegiate debate as a curricular offering, the interest in speeches primarily as models for emulation or source material for elocution, and the movement away from declamation and toward public speaking.
Debating in the 1890s was purely a club sport, not a part of the university curriculum. Baker’s book helped to move debate into the curriculum. With the growth of debate as an “official” university activity, the demand for qualified faculty to direct the activity grew. But with rare exceptions, there were few qualified faculty. By the middle 1890s, there were fewer than 60 colleges and universities across the nation with a department that focused on oral rhetoric, and those that did exist were mostly in the Midwest, with DePauw (1884), Earlham (1887), Michigan (1892), Chicago (1892), and Ohio Wesleyan (1894) leading the way.
Medhurst as Aristotle had said about rhetoric, part of the ethical branch of politics, the branch concerned with making decisions about the nature of the good in community. Wichelns had precious little upon which to build. Among nineteenth-century commentators, he found only the work of Chauncey Goodrich to have “critical significance” for the analysis of oratory. Hence his task was to construct a framework within which scholars of public address could subject oratory to the same sort of analysis that literary scholars accorded to works of fiction.